Home Of Ghana News Ghana News, Entertainment And More
In Ghanaian politics, the Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Chief Executive (MCE/MMDC) seats are usually regarded as stepping stones to greater political power. But when an MCE candidate shows such outstanding competence, vision, and mobilization at the grassroots level that a sitting Member of Parliament (MP) feels threatened politically, it is an indication of a far more serious problem—one that reflects the wasted potential of such a person for national development.
The Role of an MCE in National and Local Development
An MCE is a representative of the President at the local government level and is tasked with the implementation of government policies, managing development projects, and ensuring the smooth administration of the district. Their role demands leadership, problem-solving abilities, and the power to mobilize resources towards the development of the community. Since national development relies heavily on good local governance, a good MCE is a quintessential driver of development.
When an MCE aspirant is demonstrating intellectual gravitas, leadership skills, and political clout at least as good as or even better than the incumbent MP, then it means they have what it takes to make a difference. If such an aspirant is seen as a threat instead of an asset, then a lot is said about the effectiveness of the MP and the politics involved.
Why an MP Would Feel Threatened by an MCE Aspirant
1. Strong Grassroots Support – An MCE aspirant who enjoys strong grassroots support becomes a force to reckon with, given that they have direct access to the people. MPs who do not have strong roots in the communities might feel threatened by being overshadowed.
2. Development Track Record – If a candidate has already shown good development commitment, having brought infrastructure, social projects, and economic empowerment programs to the district, it can lay bare any inefficiency in the leadership of the MP.
3. Political Charisma and Influence – A few candidates have the natural talent to inspire and mobilize individuals outside of their immediate electoral district. Their increasing influence can ruffle an MP who feels that their political stronghold is being challenged.
4.
Competence in Policy and Governance – When a candidate demonstrates a superior understanding of governance, policy execution, and resource mobilization, it exposes the weaknesses of the incumbent MP. This can make the MP nervous, particularly if re-election is imminent.
Converting Threat into Opportunity for National Development
Instead of viewing an MCE candidate as a competitor, an MP should understand the worth of such a character in national progress. Several strategic options can be followed:
1. Cooperation Rather Than Competition
MPs and MCEs play complementary roles but with different functions. While MPs deal with legislation and national policy direction, MCEs do grassroots implementation. A wise MP would co-opt good MCEs or prospective candidates so that they can lead development instead of destructive competition.
2. Talent Development and Succession Planning
A country does well when there is a consistent stream of good leaders. Rather than stifle a good aspirant, MPs ought to guide and cultivate such a person in the confidence that leadership is not an issue of personal longevity but of institutional advancement.
3. Entrenching Political Institutions
A system where MPs are threatened by talented individuals testifies to weak political institutions. Strong institutions should render national interest above political survival at the individual level. Parties should establish mechanisms through which the best talents are nurtured to leadership roles at all levels.
4. Encouraging a Merit-Based Political Culture
The politics of Ghana need to shift from personal interests to meritocracy, where vision, ability, and dedication to national service take precedence. If a candidate is strong enough to be a threat to an MP, then the candidate must be given the chance to serve in a more productive manner towards governance rather than being discarded.
Conclusion
An MCE aspirant who poses a political threat to an MP is not a threat to national development but an asset therein. Rather than political machinations to silence such people, MPs and political parties must identify and harness their potential for the good of everyone. For Ghana to develop, leadership must be like a relay race where capable hands must be permitted to take the baton and move the country forward. The genuine danger to advancement is not the rise of powerful leaders but the fearfulness of the opposition.
By Edwin Elikem Amenyeawu
Constituency Youth Organizer
Ablekuma Central
